Case Success Stories
Real Results. Real Clients.

Client was accused of possessing commercial quantity of narcotic substance under NDPS Act. District Court rejected bail citing Section 37 restrictions. Advocate Faizan Siddiqui prepared a detailed application establishing (a) lack of credible evidence of commercial intent, (b) planted evidence from police investigation records, and (c) client's clean antecedents and family responsibilities. Allahabad High Court granted bail with standard conditions after two hearings.

Husband and in-laws faced imminent arrest in a Section 498A (dowry harassment) case. The FIR contained exaggerated allegations and named multiple family members including elderly parents. Advocate Faizan Siddiqui filed anticipatory bail at Allahabad High Court the same day of consultation, simultaneously securing an ad-interim stay on arrest. The main bail application was heard and granted within a week.

Client was a businessman facing a false FIR under IPC 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) filed by a former business partner after a civil dispute. The FIR was essentially a civil case dressed in criminal language. Advocate Faizan Siddiqui filed a Section 482 CrPC petition at Allahabad High Court, presenting the civil agreement, payment records, and showing that no criminal intent was present in the disputed transactions. The High Court quashed the FIR, holding that the dispute was purely civil in nature and filing a criminal FIR was an abuse of process.

Client had been in custody for 14 months in a murder case. District Court had rejected bail twice. Family members contacted Advocate Faizan Siddiqui who reviewed the chargesheet and identified serious weaknesses in the prosecution case — the sole eyewitness had given inconsistent statements, and there was no direct forensic evidence linking the client to the offence. A strong bail application was filed at Allahabad High Court highlighting the prolonged custody, trial delay, and evidentiary weaknesses.

Client couple had a court marriage and later decided to separate by mutual consent. Complications arose due to property disputes and child custody terms that needed to be negotiated and documented correctly. Advocate Faizan Siddiqui facilitated a comprehensive settlement agreement covering custody (joint), asset division, and maintenance, then filed for mutual consent divorce under Section 13B HMA. The decree was obtained after the mandatory 6-month cooling period, with both parties satisfied with the terms.

Young software professional was wrongly named in a cybercrime FIR based on an IP address misidentification. Police summons were received and arrest was imminent. Advocate Faizan Siddiqui immediately filed anticipatory bail at Allahabad High Court along with technical evidence showing the IP address association was from a shared network. Arrest stay granted within 3 days. Court ordered police to verify technical evidence before arrest — subsequent police investigation established the client was not the actual accused.

Client had purchased a residential property from a builder in Prayagraj. After paying full amount, builder refused to hand over possession and sold the same flat to a third party. Client filed a RERA complaint (pending) but needed immediate protection. Advocate Faizan Siddiqui filed a writ petition at Allahabad High Court seeking protection of the client's property rights. High Court issued an interim stay preventing any further sale or construction and eventually directed the builder to either deliver possession or refund with 15% compensation.

Client was arrested in an NDPS case involving personal use quantity. Family contacted Advocate Faizan Siddiqui on day 58 of custody — two days before the 60-day deadline. He immediately calculated the deadline, verified no chargesheet had been filed, and filed a default bail application under Section 167(2) CrPC the same afternoon. Application was listed urgently before the magistrate, who granted bail the next day as the statutory right was established.